Thursday 9 August 2012

THERE'S A "LOT-JOHN" BLOOD ON OUR HANDS

I am not a murderer with intent but somehow, I had to look within myself and repent before having the sanity to write this article. I trust by the end of this article that some, if not many, will have reason to ask God’s forgiveness also.

That the death of our honourable ex-president, Professor John Evans Atta-Mills weighs heavy on the heart of many Ghanaians, is at this point undeniable, and understated. But did he have to die to receive this level of national support and even in some cases, political acceptance from the population? I genuinely wish I didn’t have to be this blunt but, the truth is, it really shows how “HYPOCRITICAL” most of us are. The earlier we accept this individually and seek our personal repentance, the better.

There are questions to be asked concerning the ex-president’s death. Some of it have been asked already and many will be asked for many days, weeks and years to come. The questions will never stop. Paradoxically however, so too are the distortions of the truth. Just like the unending questions, there are even a larger number of different shades of truth about how the ex-president died. They will come from his colleagues, the rumour mongers, even the itchy rumour ears, his handlers, his political opponents and on and on and on. By the time we are done listing all the sources of different truths, half-truths and wrong-truths about his death, every Ghanaian would have been counted. Yes, every one of us would have been counted. Unfortunately, the existence of all these types of truths alongside the real truth makes even the real truth VERY tainted.

For me, nothing more is as painfully close to the president’s death as having to live with this understanding – THE PURE UNADULTERATED TRUTH WILL NEVER BE KNOWN.

Inasmuch as this is the case, you can be sure, that after the president’s burial, Ghana’s population will be falling into three distinct groupings – firstly are the majority who will feel remorse and sadness at the loss of a father figure in spite of the leadership dissatisfaction or discontent they may have felt towards him when he was alive; then secondly would be those who may have played a role in the the ex-president’s death by their direct and/or indirect actions or inactions and who as a result will remain haunted and heavy with guilt for their lifetime; and finally – the vultures, who neither have conscience nor morality, who will see his death as an opportunity to satisfy their selfish desires and make economic profits through fair or foul means.

Finally, hear me, I beg you. In the Old testament of the bible, sin, which was punishable, could only be atoned for by the high priest laying the sins of all Israel on a ram or sheep. (Leviticus 1:4) This he did by laying his hand upon the head of the ram, signifying that the ram now carried the sins of the whole nation. When Christ came to save mankind, our sins were also laid on him in like manner (Isaiah 53:6). In fact the burden of sin was so heavy on him that in the garden of gethsemane, his sweat turned to blood. The heavy sins of the world was finally portrayed physically in the form of the cross he had to carry to Golgotha. The fascinating mystery about all of this is that in the cases of the ram of atonement and Jesus, neither of them knew, saw or even met 99.99% of the people’s sins and burdens they were carrying.

I hope you digested that little biblical analogy very well – because whether you knew professor John Evans Atta-Mills personally or not, whether you met him or not; whether you insulted him silently; whether you detested him spitefully in your heart; whether you sought evil and wickedness towards him; whether you openly spoke wrongly about him or merely hated his looks; whether your little inefficiency contributed to the inefficiency of the country’s economy and which became his headache; whether you were discontent without cause or merely dissatisfied with his leadership; whether you abused your office and which as a result painted him as corrupt; whether you never prayed for him, which is your rightful duty before God; whether you knew what the answer to helping his success as a leader was and yet failed to show him how; whether you sat back and did nothing when in fact your inactions have cost the nation more…………….. and on, and on, and on…..

Whatever it is we all did in our individual capacities, big or small, directly or indirectly, intentionally and unintentionally, close by or remotely – it all added up, a heavy burden on his shoulders. It all added up, the sweat on his brow. It all added up, his death, that we now mourn. Aren’t we all now seated by his tombstone, his blood on our hands?

2 comments:

  1. Let us stop this nonsense. Please don't blame poor Ghanaians, but blame the rich people around the President (especially the rich NDC guys) who were blocking truths about the President. Of course he had to sometimes endure unfair criticisms from the opposition, but that's what democratic leadership is all about. And President Mills understood that. We all loved President Mills, but as our leader and President we had the right to question things he did whether right or wrong. He was probably the most tolerant President ever, because he allowed us to question him. And that was a plus! President Mills wanted to be questioned that's why he was tolerant. We should not in our ignorant way blame ourselves or Ghanaians for his death. I guess, culturally, blaming others for the death of another person (especially someone we favour) relieves us of the burden of truth and guilt, but that's wrong. Only God knows why President Mills is not with us; that's beyond anyone's understanding. His illness was not caused by Ghanaians. Please stop the blame game! Ignorantly casting blame on innocent and poor bystanders is a sin by itself. So stop the sinful blame.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ebby,
      I respect your comments. truth is, I wasnt blaming anyone. I believe in asking questions and I agree that every government should be questioned - t=its the most fundamental form of accountability and governance. But beyond that and where we spite the man, withhold our support from him, insult him unjustly - thats not blaming anyone - thats totally different from requesting him to honour a positively structured criticism, the sole aim of which would be to enhance the progress of the nation. So you see, there is nothing wrong with asking Politician's questions or but it starts getting very wrong when we go past the boundaries of tolerance and pile insults etc.... You sound reasonable, I am sure you will find this reasonable too.

      Delete